Recording consent law in Connecticut
Connecticut is the confusing one — you may record a face-to-face conversation you're part of, but recording a phone call needs everyone's consent.
General information, not legal advice. Recording law turns on facts — where each person physically is, whether the exchange counts as oral or electronic, and what your profession separately requires. If the answer matters, ask a lawyer licensed in Connecticut.
Short answer: Connecticut splits by medium. For in-person conversations it's a one-party-consent state — a participant may record. For telephone calls, Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-570d effectively requires all-party consent, via prior written consent, a recorded verbal consent at the start, or an automatic beep tone every ~15 seconds.
At a glance
| Statute | Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 53a-187, 53a-189 (eavesdropping); § 52-570d (telephone recording) |
|---|---|
| Applies to | One-party for in-person; all-party for telephone |
| Criminal penalty | Eavesdropping under § 53a-189 is a felony carrying up to 5 years and a fine up to $5,000. |
| Civil liability | Yes, for unlawful telephone recordings under § 52-570d — damages, costs and reasonable attorney's fees. No fixed statutory floor, and no equivalent civil action was found for in-person recordings. |
The detail that catches people out
Connecticut runs a split regime, which is exactly where people slip up. Recording a meeting you're sitting in is generally fine under the one-party rule. Recording the same conversation over the phone is not, unless you satisfy § 52-570d.
The phone statute gives three ways to comply: prior written consent from all parties, a verbal consent recorded at the start of the call, or an automatic tone repeated roughly every fifteen seconds for the duration. In practice, saying “I'm recording this call” and capturing everyone's agreement on the recording is the usual route.
Because so many meetings are now video calls rather than either classic category, the conservative reading is to treat a remote call like a phone call and get everyone's consent.
What this means for AI meeting notes
If your client conversations happen on the phone or over video — which for most professionals they do — Connecticut functionally requires all-party consent. The in-person one-party rule is the exception, not the everyday case.
Two things worth separating. Whether a recording bot is visible in the attendee list has no bearing on any of the above — the statute governs the recording, not how obvious your tooling is. And where the recording is processed is a different question again: Connecticut law decides whether you may record at all, while your duty of confidentiality decides who may then receive it.
A tool that captures audio through your own machine and processes it locally, like Oats, removes the second problem and leaves the first entirely intact. You still need whatever consent Connecticut requires.
If people are in different states
A call with someone in a one-party-consent state and someone in Connecticut is not a one-party call. Standard conservative practice is to comply with the strictest rule represented on the call — get everyone's agreement, out loud, and note that you got it. See our overview of US recording consent law for the wider picture and the other all-party states.
Sources: RCFP — Connecticut. Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-570d. Verified July 2026. Laws change — check the primary source before relying on this.
Notes that never leave your Mac
Free forever. No account. No server holding your recordings.
Download for Mac